Episode 38: One on One with Jeffrey Lichtman (Part 2)

Join us for Part 2 of our Killer Cross Examination Podcast as I go one on one with Jeffrey Lichtman, Esq, the El Chapo’s and John Gotti’s criminal defense lawyer. You don’t want to miss this.  The interview has been described as “two sharks on a zoom”.  A little about our guest –

If you’ve been in trouble in New York, know someone who has been in trouble in New York or followed the trials of El Chapo (yes that El Chapo) or John Gotti, Jr. (yes that John Gotti, Jr) than you know our guest, Jeffrey Lichtman.  Lichtman is perhaps New York’s most sought after criminal defense lawyer having defended El Chapo and obtaining acquittals for John Gotti, Jr.  His clients include rappers “The Game”, and “Fat Joe” among a veritable who’s who of those charged with crimes in New York.

Lichtman’s style of cross examination has been referred to as a “relentless pounding”, a bludgeoning, putting witnesses “through the blender and shreds[ing] them.” Lichtman is an advocate of “killer cross examination” and shares valuable tips, strategies and war stories that are both wildly entertaining for the non-lawyer and incredibly instructive for criminal defense lawyers and trial lawyers.  Lichtman shares with us never before revealed stories about his defenses of El Chapo and Gotti and also tells me about his preparation, work ethic, use of impeachment evidence, etc. and how he has to win for not only his client but for himself.

Jeffrey Lichtman is the principal and founder of the Law Officers of Jeffrey Lichtman and can be found at www.JeffreyLichtman.com.

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 37: One on One with Jeffrey Lichtman

Join us for Part 1 of our Killer Cross Examination Podcast as I go one on one with Jeffrey Lichtman, Esq, the El Chapo’s and John Gotti’s criminal defense lawyer.  You don’t want to miss this.  The interview has been described as “two sharks on a zoom”.  A little about our guest –

If you’ve been in trouble in New York, know someone who has been in trouble in New York or followed the trials of El Chapo (yes that El Chapo) or John Gotti, Jr. (yes that John Gotti, Jr) than you know our guest, Jeffrey Lichtman.  Lichtman is perhaps New York’s most sought after criminal defense lawyer having defended El Chapo and obtaining acquittals for John Gotti, Jr.  His clients include rappers “The Game”, and “Fat Joe” among a veritable who’s who of those charged with crimes in New York.  

Lichtman’s style of cross examination has been referred to as a “relentless pounding”, a bludgeoning, putting witnesses “through the blender and shreds[ing] them.”  Lichtman is an advocate of “killer cross examination” and shares valuable tips, strategies and war stories that are both wildly entertaining for the non-lawyer and incredibly instructive for criminal defense lawyers and trial lawyers.  Lichtman shares with us never before revealed stories about his defenses of El Chapo and Gotti and also tells me about his preparation, work ethic, use of impeachment evidence, etc. and how he has to win for not only his client but for himself.  

Jeffrey Lichtman is the principal and founder of the Law Officers of Jeffrey Lichtman and can be found at www.JeffreyLichtman.com.  

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 36: My Story- Part 1

As a child, I was labeled a “bad kid.”  I had ADHD before anyone had really considered it an ailment.  But people want to know more about how I got here … to this point and a part of that story is how I came to relate and empathize with the little guy, the outcast and you can’t understand that part of me without knowing about my youth.

I’ve said that defending the little guy is in my genes, my blood and in my DNA.  People have asked how did I get here? How did I become an advocate for the accused, disregarded and ostracized?  To those who want to know and those interested in how someone like ends up being constructed — how I get here and what makes me tick — this episode is for you.

In this episode, I share some painful stories about my youth.  My unpopularity, my feelings of being an outsider and my diagnosis of ADHD in the 70’s!  To those parents whose children suffer from ADHD or ADD, I’ve offered an opportunity to reach out to me.  To those kids, suffering from it, I make the same offer.  Reach out … you can overcome and even in some ways, harness the condition and achieve.

Dr. Fagenbaum (the doctor that diagnosed me), Mrs. Snow (my first grade teacher at Pasteur Elementary in Detroit), Mrs. Carlton (a teacher of mine at Pasteur Elementary in Detroit), my mother, who dutifully packed my Ritalin pill every day for me to take a lunch, this episode is for you, and all the parents of kids who are on the fringe, this one is for you.

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 35: Hanging Judges

We’ve all heard the stories about the tough judges, the judges who view themselves as hard-asses.  Lawyers traveling to other towns always ask, “tell me about the judge” because we want to know if the judge is tough or has developed a reputation for being a “hanging judge”.  They have no place in today’s legal system but they exist and because of their impact in the lives of the accused before them, I take them on during this episode.  We subject this style of judge to killer cross examination.

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 34: Proverbs 18:17

The first to state his case seems right, until another comes and examines him.

They biblical phrase describes trials, direct examination and cross examination in some ways better than any book or pamphlet.  Witnesses take the stand and on direct examination and “seem right”. They seem right, believable and convincing.  Then the challenge to their story comes in … we challenge their story.  We provide the counterweight.  When done, the witness no longer seems right.

I take you through a recent case, a probation violation hearing, where Proverbs 18:17 came to life.  I walk you through how the prosecution witness gave damning testimony against our client and it seemed “right” until cross examined.   This is a valuable lesson in not jumping to conclusions and allowing cross examination to tell the story.

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 33: Killer Cross Examination Takes On Robinhood

Robinhood. Vlad.  Citadel.  Steve Cohen. David Portnoy.  Game Stop.  Nokia.  AMC Theaters Holdings.  Dogecoin.  Bitcoin.  Shorts.  Options.  Wall Street bets.  Reddit.  We’ve seen a convergence of these names, financial terms, stocks, companies and entities over last few weeks as old school Wall Street butted heads with the public and WSB Reddit.  But when traders needed a platform to trade, Robin Hood and other similar trading companies banned trades, halted trading, changed the rules.  Wall Street benefitted.  The individual investor did not.  Yet, not one of the leaders, power brokers or those involved were subjected to real cross examination – real powerful, probing questioning.  I saw the interviews on television.  Softball questions.  Time limits.  What we needed is/was killer cross examination of Vlad and others.  In fact, I offered to do it.  

This is where Killer Cross Examination meets Robin Hood.  

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 32: The Questions I Get Asked

I get asked a lot of questions about criminal defense.  I think all criminal lawyers do.  The questions, you can guess them:

  • how can you defend those people
  • have you ever defended someone who is guilty
  • have you ever defended someone that admitted they were guilty
  • have you ever defended someone who you knew was guilty
  • have you ever gotten anyone off that was guilty

Here my take on why these questions miss the mark on what I/we do.

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 31: Prosecutor Appeals Are Not Appealing

As a child, I watched the Wide World of Sports on ABC.  Like others, I loved the introduction – “the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat.”  Who can forget the iconic ski jumper falling sideways off the ski jump, crashing and tumbling.  Pain. Hurt.  Disappointment.   In the criminal justice system, prosecutors can appeal rulings that they don’t like – when evidence is suppressed, police are adjudged to have broken the law or when a charge/case is dismissed.  I’ve watched client’s jump for joy, elation and relief when the charges are dismissed or evidence suppressed. I’ve watched as client’s have the proverbial rug pulled out from under them when the prosecutor appeals and tries to reverse the ruling.  It is cruel.  

In this episode, I explore and discuss this phenomenon.  As I said, when prosecutor’s appeal, it is not appealing.  

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.

Episode 30: Mia Sat For An Interview – Why You Shouldn’t

You’ve seen the interviews. Client sitting there. Lawyer next to her. And a reporter conducting an interview of them while the case is under investigation or while pending. Mia Ponsetto just did it, with her lawyer. Casey Anthony did it, with her lawyer. Others have done it with their lawyers too.

DON’T BE LIKE MIA. OR HER LAWYER.

In this episode, I explore these disastrous interviews and why you and your lawyer should avoid them at every turn.

Please be aware we are relying on impressions, recollections, memories and interpretations.